Try and practice the latest PECB : ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager real questions & answers

Scenario 2: NoSpace, a forward-thinking e-commerce store based in London, is renowned for its diverse products and advanced technology. To enhance its information security, NoSpace implemented an ISMS according to ISO/IEC 27001 to better protect customer data and ensure business continuity. Additionally, the company adopted ISO/IEC 27035-1 and ISO/IEC 27035-2 guidelines. Mark, the incident manager at NoSpace, strategically led the entire implementation. He played a crucial role in aligning the company's ISMS with the requirements specified in ISO/IEC 27001, using ISO/IEC 27035-1 guidelines as the foundation.
During a routine internal audit, a minor anomaly was detected in the data traffic that could potentially indicate a security threat. Mark was immediately notified to assess the situation. Then, Mark and his team immediately escalated the incident to crisis management to handle the potential threat without further assessment. The decision was made to ensure a swift response.
After resolving the situation, Mark decided to update the incident management process. During the initial phase of incident management, Mark recognized the necessity of updating NoSpace's information security policies. This included revising policies related to risk management at the organizational level as well as for specific systems, services, or networks. The second phase of the updated incident management process included the assessment of the information associated with occurrences of information security events and the importance of classifying events and vulnerabilities as information security incidents. During this phase, he also introduced a "count down" process to expedite the evaluation and classification of occurrences, determining whether they should be recognized as information security incidents.
Mark developed a new incident management policy to enhance the organization's resilience and adaptability in handling information security incidents. Starting with a strategic review session with key stakeholders, the team prioritized critical focus areas over less impactful threats, choosing not to include all potential threats in the policy document. This decision was made to keep the policy streamlined and actionable, focusing on the most significant risks identified through a risk assessment. The policy was shaped by integrating feedback from various department heads to ensure it was realistic and enforceable. Training and awareness initiatives were tailored to focus only on critical response roles, optimizing resource allocation and focusing on essential capabilities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Do the actions taken by the IRT of NoSpace upon detecting the anomaly align with the objectives of a structured approach to incident management?

• A. No, escalating a minor anomaly directly to crisis management without further assessment deviates from the objectives of a structured incident management approach, which typically reserves crisis management for more severe, crisis-level situations
• B. No, the actions taken by the IRT do not align with structured incident management objectives because they failed to utilize external resources immediately
• C. Yes, escalating all incidents to crisis management regardless of severity and focusing solely on the crisis management process aligns with the objectives

Scenario 7: Located in central London, Konzolo has become a standout innovator in the cryptocurrency field.
The company faced challenges monitoring the security of its own and third-party systems. An incident involving server downtime exposed vulnerabilities in a third-party service provider's security posture, leading to unauthorized access.
In response, Konzolo launched a thorough vulnerability scan of its cryptographic wallet software and uncovered critical weaknesses due to outdated encryption algorithms. Noah, the IT manager, documented and communicated the findings. Paulina was brought in to lead a forensic investigation, provide actionable insights, and help enhance the company's overall incident response strategy based on ISO/IEC 27035 standards.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which of the following steps for effective security monitoring did Konzolo NOT adhere to?

• A. Monitor security vulnerabilities
• B. Monitor behavioral analytics
• C. Monitor the outsourced services

During the 'detect and report' phase of incident management at TechFlow, the incident response team began collecting detailed threat intelligence and conducting vulnerability assessments related to these login attempts.
Additionally, the incident response team classified a series of unusual login attempts as a potential security incident and distributed initial reports to the incident coordinator. Is this approach correct?

• A. No, because information security incidents cannot yet be classified as information security incidents in this phase
• B. Yes, because classifying events as information security incidents is essential during this phase
• C. No, because collecting detailed information about threats and vulnerabilities should occur in later phases

What is the primary focus of internal exercises in information security incident management?

• A. Involving external organizations to assess collaboration
• B. Testing inter-organizational communication
• C. Evaluating the readiness of the incident response team

According to ISO/IEC 27035-2, how should an organization plan the development of the incident response team capabilities?

• A. By focusing only on internal capabilities
• B. By considering how often certain capabilities were needed in the past
• C. By discontinuing any capabilities that have not been used recently